On Thu, 29 May 2008 18:29:01 -0400 Tom Lane wrote:
> Dimitri Fontaine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > While at it, would it be possible for the "simple" part of the core
> > team statement to include automatic failover?
>
> No, I think it would be a useless expenditure of energy. Failover
> includes a lot of things that are not within our purview: switching
> IP addresses to point to the new server, some kind of STONITH solution
> to keep the original master from coming back to life, etc. Moreover
> there are already projects/products concerned with those issues.
True words. Failover is not and should not be part of PostgreSQL.
But PG can help the failover solution, as example: an easy-to-use
interface about the current slave status comes into my mind. Other
ideas might also be possible.
> It might be useful to document where to find solutions to that problem,
> but we can't take it on as part of core Postgres.
Ack
Kind regards
--
Andreas 'ads' Scherbaum
German PostgreSQL User Group
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
