Greg Smith wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
In reality though, what should happen is we should have a list of
companies and consultants that are willing to be paid to implement
features, todos and bug fixes.
I think the professional support company listing is already that list.
It is a much larger superset of that list. There's a lot of entries
there that provide support in various ways, but not core code
customizations. You cannot expect anyone not already involved in the
community to have any idea which of those companies have any track
record of getting new features implemented.
Maybe all that's needed is to extend the "provides" section there with
a tag for those who are willing to take that sort of work on.
Plus an ability to filter the list on those criteria. I'd also like to
see a space for companies to state which PostgreSQL major contributors
are working for them. That should be of some assistance to sponsors in
picking a development company to deal with.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
