"David Fetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Please explain your reasoning here. The project has taken nasty hits > on its infrastructure already (pgfoundry) because the author of the > software had a go-it-alone, I-know-best attitude that sooner than > later forced us to fork. As a direct consequence, pgfoundry now needs > a redo that will take a pgfoundry administrator many of work in their > "ample spare time." > > Let's not cause more pinch points here.
Well sure, but I'm not sure the software used to distribute the program makes the main difference there. I don't know much about the two programs, what makes you think one is more of a go-it-alone style of development than the other? -- Gregory Stark EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com Get trained by Bruce Momjian - ask me about EnterpriseDB's PostgreSQL training! -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
