Zdenek Kotala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane napsal(a):
>> Cutting a third off the size of a system index has got to be worth
>> something, but is it worth a hack as ugly as this one?
> The problem what I see there is how to fit with in-place-upgrade. Catalog
> should
> be generate from scratch, but if somebody uses name in regular table it
> invokes
> request for reindex.
Actually, an existing index stored as "name" would continue to work
fine, so I think this could be worked around. But in any case name is
deprecated for user use, so anyone who suffers a reindex has only
themselves to blame.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
