At 2008-07-08 09:32:44 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > The idea of this patch is to avoid the need to make explicit > > > grants on sequences owned by tables. [...] > > I had a look at this patch and it looks good. The only thing that's > not clear to me is whether we have agreed we want this to be the > default behavior?
For what it's worth, I quite like the idea. (I looked at the patch, and it looks good to me too.) > Wouldn't it be clearer to build a list with all the sequences owned by > the tables in istmt.objects, and then call ExecGrantStmt_oids() a > single time with the big list? i.e., to hoist most of the istmt_seq initialisation out of the loop, right? Yes, that makes sense. -- ams -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
