Hello 2008/8/23 Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Friday 22 August 2008 07:41:30 Decibel! wrote: >> If we're really worried about it we can have a GUC for a few versions >> that turns off named parameter assignment. But I don't think we >> should compromise the design on the theory that some folks might be >> using that as an operator *and* can't change their application to >> wrap it's use in (). > > Even if that were a reasonable strategy, you can't use GUC parameters to alter > parser behavior. >
I thing, so it's possible - in this case. We should transform named params to expr after syntax analyze. Pavel -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
