On Friday 22 August 2008 07:41:30 Decibel! wrote: > If we're really worried about it we can have a GUC for a few versions > that turns off named parameter assignment. But I don't think we > should compromise the design on the theory that some folks might be > using that as an operator *and* can't change their application to > wrap it's use in ().
Even if that were a reasonable strategy, you can't use GUC parameters to alter parser behavior. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
