On Wed, 3 Sep 2008 16:04:12 -0400 (EDT) Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Section question: with those changes, would it then be reasonable to > you to keep that column named "default" instead of giving it a less > common name? > > > You are adopting a very narrow mindset, which seems to be that only > > DBAs look at this view. > > DBAs are the only group I am always getting questions in this area > from. Everybody else seemed happy with the status quo, where the > value wasn't exposed at all and you just looked in guc.c to see what > it was. I guess I would ask, "Who else would we be targeting this for?". DBAs seem to be the only logical choice. Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
