> I meant that -- hypothetically if we did accept the feature as-is -- the > number of evaluations would be documented to be undefined, not N. That > would avoid the backwards-compatibility problem. > > This one point is probably not worth discussing now, because argument > #1 and #2 stand on their own.
Agreed. Plus, both Tom and Pavel seem to think this is a relatively solvable problem. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
