On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 17:11 +0200, Csaba Nagy wrote: > Why not have a design where the slave is in control for it's own data ? > I mean the slave...
The slave only exists because it is a copy of the master. If you try to "startup" a slave without first having taken a copy, how would you bootstrap the slave? With what? To what? It sounds cool, but its not practical. I posted a workable suggestion today on another subthread. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
