> > That's kind of what I'm doing now. But I'm wondering if I should > > bother with pgFoundry at all. It seems pretty dead (see Josh Berkus's > > reply).
Actually, pgFoundry remains extremely popular. Currently, we're getting an average of 2-3 new projects a week. The issue with pgFoundry is that it's based on a hacked version of the GForge code, which had legacy problems to begin with and is now no longer upgradable. And while lots of people want to complain about it, nobody wants to put in the 15-25 hours of work required to fix it up so that it supports SVN and code snippets (including me). However, I agree with Robert that maintaining a collab site is, today, a bad use of our limited administration resources, which could be better turned to developing directory and build services (for "kitchen sink" packages). Realistically, though, shutting down pgFoundry might take as much work as fixing it. -- --Josh Josh Berkus PostgreSQL San Francisco -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
