-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Le 20 sept. 08 à 09:42, Dave Page a écrit :
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Joshua D. Drake
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave Page wrote:
Well that's not strictly true - I persuaded one of the GForge
developers to work on the upgrade. As far as I'm aware, we're still
waiting for the hardware/OS platform to be sorted out after some
initial problems. I suspect JD will tell me something different
though
- that being the case, perhaps we can work out the issues and get on
with the upgrade.
I suppose the plan is to upgrade to a newer GForge. Is it still time
to propose something completely different? I have real good feedbacks
about VHFFS, a perl based clean-room re-implementation of it, if you
want to see it this way.
http://www.vhffs.org/wiki/index.php
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/VHFFS (easy to grasp keywords)
Hope this helps, regards,
- --
dim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjVUqcACgkQlBXRlnbh1bnuWwCgsWMSrYACh2lOt+xbeqa6DCbO
j7AAnifgloNY7ldaA+54S9HLlLxqBvuC
=LoLv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
