On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:34 AM, Magnus Hagander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 20 okt 2008, at 16.51, Andrew Dunstan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> No, it's not just a hack. It's very close to what we'd probably do if we >> built the facility right into the language, although it does involve the >> overhead of calling the trigger. However, it performs reasonably well - not >> surprising since the guts of it is just a memcmp() call. >> > In that case, why not put the trigger in core so people can use it easily?
+1 This is hard to get right and a common source of errors. merlin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
