On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:16, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:23:36PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >>> I would argue that it's already designed wrong if there's need for >>> PL-specific implementation effort. > >> I'm not sure how else to do this. The current implementation returns >> char *, which doesn't translate uniformly into the PLs. > > Surely they all have a way to call a SQL function that returns text.
Sure but when you call that function you get *that* functions qualifier. And unless there already is a way to grab the "parent" query qualifiers, the PL specific hacks seem not so bad and very similar to how we have to build trigger arguments for every PL already. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
