On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 10:37:41AM -0800, David Fetter wrote: > On Tue, Nov 04, 2008 at 12:23:55PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > "Alex Hunsaker" <bada...@gmail.com> writes: > > > On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 05:16, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > > > which doesn't seem like it would amount to anything compared to the > > total execution of a plan node, but we do know that ExecProcNode > > is a hot spot in some usages. > > Going with the ExecProcNode modification you're proposing, how big > would a minimal pre-MED patch be?
Tom, I know you've been busy with lots of stuff, so here's a little reminder. I talked with a couple of people who know the back-end much better than I do. One said the above was way under-specified, and the other said he'd started work on it, but hasn't had much time. Since you're the one who brought this up, I think it's on you to flesh it out at least a little bit, or at least to describe it in enough detail that someone else could. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fet...@gmail.com Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
