> As this hasn't happened and I haven't been able to demonstrate it being useful > myself I guess it makes more sense to separate the two now and set the > sequential scan stuff aside until someone can demonstrate it being useful.
Sounds good. How soon do you think you can post updated patches? > But as I said, it was mostly so I could tell what the slow start algorithm was > doing and make sure it was doing anything at all in testing. In that case, I think you should just rip it all out for now. >> Department of nitpicking: > > Will clean these up, they all look valid. I thought I did clean things up > already -- I guess you should be happy you're looking at it *after* that > cleanup :/ Maybe it's you who should be glad... :-) ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
