Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Well, for example pg_catalog.xmlconcat(...) will behave differently if
>> we make this change.
> Uh, because there is no pg_catalog.xmlconcat() in 8.3. Why is that
> relevant?
My point is it's a user-visible change --- maybe a subtle one, but still
a change that in principle could break some app somewhere --- and no
good reason has been put forward for making it.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
