On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 19:34 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> Well, for example pg_catalog.xmlconcat(...) will behave differently if > >> we make this change. > > > Uh, because there is no pg_catalog.xmlconcat() in 8.3. Why is that > > relevant? > > My point is it's a user-visible change --- maybe a subtle one, but still > a change that in principle could break some app somewhere --- and no > good reason has been put forward for making it.
Uhh... what user is going to be calling pg_catalog.xmlconcat() in any version? Wouldn't it be public.xml... or other namespace? Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
