Tom Lane wrote: > KaiGai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'll try your approash in first, as follows: > > This seems a vast amount of uglification to avoid adding an argument to > CreateTemplateTupleDesc. We do that kind of thing all the time --- it > is a simple and reliable change to make. > > When designing a patch, you should generally try to make the code look > like the patch has been there all along. Contorting logic to avoid > a simple API change is not good.
Hmm..., I think your opinion is right, indeed. In my conclusion, I want to postpone the feature to toggle row-level access controls due to its scale of changes. I can understand the requirements for reduction of storage consumption with security attribute. I'll implement it next to the main feature of SE-PostgreSQL. Simon, I'm sorry, if my expression felt you uncomfortable. Thanks, -- KaiGai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
