-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160
> You're not making a lot of sense here, because INSERT always affects > exactly the named table. It's UPDATE and DELETE where the behavior > is debatable. *blink* Ah, right you are, had a typo in my testing script. Excellent news, I'm now officially okay with either solution then. Thanks! - -- Greg Sabino Mullane [EMAIL PROTECTED] End Point Corporation PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200812011431 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkk0O5YACgkQvJuQZxSWSsg20QCcCyWXQiIb8AwBJ0DixdJHXce5 2IAAoN1lNij5Oqz0ay4kDnvyJ72xVheR =sW9/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
