Tom Lane wrote:
> Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> that plpgsql's handling of command-counter changes is broken, but it
> >> does not follow that sprinkling the code with SetQuerySnapshot is wise.
>
> > Why do you blame PL/pgSQL for that? I don't see a single
> > reference to the command counter from the PL/pgSQL sources.
> > All it does is using SPI. So does "using SPI" by itself count
> > as "boken"?
>
> Sorry: SPI is broken, not plpgsql. Does that make you feel better?
Not that it "makes my day". But it makes me feel better,
thanks.
Jan
--
#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me. #
#================================================== [EMAIL PROTECTED] #
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html
