Re: [HACKERS] PL/pgSQL bug?

[Tom Lane]

Jan Wieck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> that plpgsql's handling of command-counter changes is broken, but it
>> does not follow that sprinkling the code with SetQuerySnapshot is wise.

>     Why  do  you  blame  PL/pgSQL  for that? I don't see a single
>     reference to the command counter from the  PL/pgSQL  sources.
>     All it does is using SPI. So does "using SPI" by itself count
>     as "boken"?

Sorry: SPI is broken, not plpgsql.  Does that make you feel better?

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]