> I can see an argument about constraint_exclusion but > default_statistics_target I don't.
Why not? I don't want to accept a big increase in ANALYZE times (or planning times, though I'm really not seeing that at this point) without some benefit. >> It seems unlikely that you would want 256 MB of checkpoint segments on >> a database that is only 100 MB (or even 500 MB). But you might very >> well want that on a database that is 1 TB. > > It also seems unlikely that you would hit 256MB of checkpoint segments > on a 100MB database before checkpoint_timeout and if you did, you > certainly did need them. So why do we have this parameter at all? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
