Bruce Momjian wrote: > Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> Cleaning up the parallel restore patch I came across a question I might >> have asked before, but one which in any case I worked around: >> >> Why do we carefully define fseeko() for WIN32 but then not define >> HAVE_FSEEKO, which makes doing the former pretty much pointless? > > With Andrew, I have developed and applied the attached patch so MinGW > handles fseeko() translation similar to Unix. > > Someone will need to update MSVC to have similar behavior.
Which is what? :-) It just needs to set HAVE_FSEEKO to 1 in pg_config.h? //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers