Magnus Hagander wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Andrew Dunstan wrote:
Cleaning up the parallel restore patch I came across a question I might have asked before, but one which in any case I worked around:

Why do we carefully define fseeko() for WIN32 but then not define HAVE_FSEEKO, which makes doing the former pretty much pointless?
With Andrew, I have developed and applied the attached patch so MinGW
handles fseeko() translation similar to Unix.

Someone will need to update MSVC to have similar behavior.

Which is what? :-)

It just needs to set HAVE_FSEEKO to 1 in pg_config.h?



Yep. I have fixed it already.

cheers

andrew

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to