On 7 Jan 2009, at 09:47, Bruce Momjian <[email protected]> wrote:
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
It's required by the sync replication patch, but has no value
otherwise.
Well, we have talked about allowing more signalling long-term, and
this
would accomplish that independent of the sync replication, so we might
want to revisit this someday if it isn't included in sync replication.
I also needed this for the progress indicator patch. I used SIGQUIT
for the proof-of-concept patch but I wouldn't want to lose that signal
for real.
--
Greg
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
