Robert Haas wrote:
git IS a stable archive of what the patches really were.
No. A developer can delete, move and rebase branches in his own repository as he likes, and all of those operations "modify history". In fact, a developer can completely destroy or take offline his published repository. It's *not* an archive.
There's other reasons why I like git very much over cvs, but archiving is not one of them.
-- Heikki Linnakangas EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
