Tom Lane wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> David Fetter <da...@fetter.org> writes: >>>> 1. Remove the messages size limits on -hackers. They serve no useful >>>> purpose, and they interfere with our development process. >>> Agreed, or at least boost it up a good bit more. > >> the question really is how much "a bit more" is - right now the limit is >> 100000 characters which limits us to ~70KB of attachments (around the >> size of the Hot-standby patch if bzip2 compressed). > >> The SE-Postgres patch for example is ~650KB uncompressed - if we want to >> cope with uncompressed patches that large we would have to increase >> the current limit by a factor of 10 at least. > > I feel no need to encourage people to send huge patches uncompressed ;-) > > gzip normally gets at least 3x or 4x on large diffs. So a limit around > 250K ought to be enough.
Given this, I've increased the size to 1Mb. Let's see how that works out. //Magnus -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
