Robert Haas wrote:
> > "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: > >> When I set it up, it automatically appended the time so I got: > >> postgresql.log.1231878270 > >> That seems a bit, well wrong. If I say I want postgresql.log I should > >> get postgresql.log. > > > > You'd probably reconsider around the time the log file filled your disk. > > You really *don't* want a single fixed filename, you want some kind of > > rotation series. > > Clearly so, but it does seem a bit odd if there's really NO way to > insist on a particular fixed filename. Indeed ... some of us have scripts that count on a given name. Fiddling them to look for the most recent seems like an unwarranted bit of busy work. Or am I missing something ? If I _want_ a foot-deringer, isn't that my business ? My $0.02 worth (less and less, every day) Greg Williamson Senior DBA DigitalGlobe Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information and must be protected in accordance with those provisions. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. (My corporate masters made me say this.)
