Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> writes: > > The basic goal of the patch was to make 'S' consistent for all \d > > backslash commands, and we had a lot of discussion about it, and many > > people asked for it (I can't find my user functions). > > I think this falls in the category of "be careful what you wish for, > you might get it". It is now blindingly obvious that the folks asking > for that had not actually lived with the behavior for any period of > time. > > Personally I think we should just revert the patch and go back to the > behavior we've had for umpteen years. However, if you cannot bear to > leave well enough alone, how about *reversing* the sense --- that is, > default behavior is to show everything and there is an extra character > to omit system objects?
I got several emails thanking me for applying the patch, so there is clearly user-demand for 'S'. I think _we_ as developers look at the system stuff a lot but in user-land, they would rather not see it by default. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
