On Monday 26 January 2009 2:12:02 pm Tom Lane wrote: > Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com> writes: > > So, some feedback to make this decision more difficult: > > > > Users: care about HS more than anything else in the world. > > I don't think this is correct. There are certainly a lot of users who > would like an in-core replication solution, but HS by itself is not that > --- you also need (near) real-time log shipping, which we have already > decided to punt to 8.5. Precisely. Thank you.
> That being the case, I think the argument that HS is a must-have feature for 8.4 is actually rather weak. I am just one person, representing one company...but I do agree, fwiw. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
