On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 20:28 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes: > > On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 19:21 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > >> Then why has *nobody* stepped up to review the design, much less the > >> whole patch? > > > It was only today that I saw an announcement go out to our announce list > > to try and get people to pop their heads up and help. It looks like > > today is the day that someone actually reached out to the SELinux folks > > and asked for help. > > Hmm, you think selinux people read pgsql-announce?
*shrug* they very well might if they are also postgres people. > But seriously, > we *have* been trying to get people's attention for this patch, both > inside and outside the postgres community, for well over a year now. > The lack of response has been depressing and (IMHO) telling. Nowhere > have we gotten anything more concrete than "ooh, that's cool ... maybe > I might use it someday, but I can't be bothered right now". Well that is certainly unfortunate. If the very community that invented the tech isn't willing to help.... :( Joshua D. Drake > > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
