* Devrim GÜNDÜZ (dev...@gunduz.org) wrote: > On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > With my other hat on (the red one) what I'm concerned about is whether > > this patch will ever produce a feature that I could turn on in the > > standard Red Hat/Fedora build of Postgres. > > FWIW, as you know, sepostgresql is already included in Fedora. You can > continue shipping it as a seperate RPM set.
hrmpf, I wonder if that's why RH hasn't been as interested in pushing
for inclusion upstream... Maybe the feel that's a workable solution? I
wouldn't agree... but I don't run RH.
Thanks,
Stephen
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
