On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 11:49 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Yeah, people like certification, but they also like products that work. > >> Did you stop reading before getting to my non-security-based complaints? > > > I read them, but I suspect they are issues that can be addressed. How > > would any of this affect join removal, anyway? > > It would prevent us from making optimizations that assume foreign key > constraints hold; which is a performance issue not a covert-channel > issue.
Well, only when sepostgresql = on. I would imagine Oracle has exactly the same issue. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
