-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Rick Vernam wrote: >> The reference documentation is *always* intended to be more complete and >> more authoritative than the narrative description. If you don't think >> so then you need to readjust your expectations. > very well, I did not know that. > expectations readjusted. thanks.
Me neither. I wonder how many other long term users (I have used pgsql for more than a decade - 6.2 was my first version if memory serves) and have never caught that nuance either. Maybe that should be printed as a note on the "narrative description pages".. something like: "Note this is a simplified introduction to the subject. For authorative description please see topic x in section y (and link to it of course ;)) Svenne -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkmJkpEACgkQPPDUIBpvWQsY2ACdG3y9Ho2vW3z2OKePTy9jCkAq QqEAnAn9J+ZOnAsohnPqbGCtLbfC6e7G =FiGn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
