Pavel Stehule wrote:
2009/2/17 Josh Berkus <[email protected]>:
All,
I thought we'd agreed to compromise on having SE without row-level in 8.4,
and working on SE with row-level in 8.5. Why are we revisiting this
argument? 8.4 is *already* late; arguing further about the terms of SE
simply risk us being forced to reject it entirely.
I absolutely agree. It nonsense open again and again closed question.
I also agree. What we should do now is to make progress the proposed
feature for v8.4, not a upcoming feature.
BogDan,
As I noted before, I can understand your requirement, but we already
decided to postpone a part of features within originally proposed,
because we're paying effort to develop v8.4 within reasonable schedule.
I'd like you to guess who wanted the row-level stuff to be merged most.
Thanks,
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <[email protected]>
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected])
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
