> Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2009/2/17 Josh Berkus <j...@agliodbs.com>: >>> All, >>> >>> I thought we'd agreed to compromise on having SE without row-level in >>> 8.4, >>> and working on SE with row-level in 8.5. Why are we revisiting this >>> argument? 8.4 is *already* late; arguing further about the terms of SE >>> simply risk us being forced to reject it entirely. >>> >> >> I absolutely agree. It nonsense open again and again closed question. > > I also agree. What we should do now is to make progress the proposed > feature for v8.4, not a upcoming feature. > > BogDan, > As I noted before, I can understand your requirement, but we already > decided to postpone a part of features within originally proposed, > because we're paying effort to develop v8.4 within reasonable schedule. > I'd like you to guess who wanted the row-level stuff to be merged most. >
I understand postgresql 8.4 should be shipped within reasonable schedule, but you see, row-level security will help more people then integration with se-linux. Please don't understand me wrong, I appreciate what you do, but for me se-linux is a little "science fiction" (and I ensure you, they are many like me). I see a lot of new useful features on postgresql 8.4 and row-level should be the cherry on the cake. I hope row level security will be accepted soon on 8.5 and you'll continue to provide a patch for 8.4.x too. A patch against 8.4 will help many of us to start working with this feature on a stable server until 8.5 will be out. Thanks for your hard work, BogDan, -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
