Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Hopefully this is the last version of this patch.

A few more comments would help --- in particular the header comment
for kwlist.h should explain that the calling file is supposed to define
PG_KEYWORD appropriately for its needs.  I also wonder whether Greg
isn't right that it would be better if the header contained *only*
the PG_KEYWORD macros, rather than presupposing that the caller wants
to build a constant table named ScanKeywords with them.

In general though it's certainly cleaner than the old way.

                        regards, tom lane

-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to