On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Magnus Hagander <mag...@hagander.net> wrote: > On 30 mar 2009, at 17.24, Andrew Chernow <a...@esilo.com> wrote: > >> Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>> BTW, unless someone objects I'd like to make the name of that function >>> PQinitSecurity. >> >> Agreed. Although, both PQinitSecure and PQinitSecurity are very general >> names. "Security" can mean a lot of things. Maybe the name should be more >> particular, like PQinitOpenSSL. I think its okay to reference the openssl >> project name being how this function is designed to work with openssl's >> library split. >> > +1 > > It's quite likely that well want to support another ssl library in the > future. At least likely enough that any api we define should take it into > consideration.
+1. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
