Chris Browne <cbbro...@acm.org> writes: > j...@agliodbs.com (Josh Berkus) writes: >> This one is also really bad, but probably only Doc-patchable. >> However, can SQL/XML really be said to be core functionality if it >> only works in UTF-8? >> * BUG #4622: xpath only work in utf-8 server encoding
> Well, much of the definition of XML assumes the use of Unicode, so I > don't feel entirely badly about there being such a restriction. > It seems likely to me that opening its use to other encodings has a > considerable risk of breaking due to a loss of, erm, "closure," in the > mathematical sense. Or, alternatively, opening a Pandora's Box of > needing to do translations to prevent mappings from breaking. Is there a reason not to fix it as suggested at http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-bugs/2009-02/msg00032.php ie recode on-the-fly from database encoding to UTF8? regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
