On Sun, Apr 05, 2009 at 07:55:44AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Andrew Dunstan <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tom Lane wrote: > >> If there are no objections, I'm going to remove the following items > >> from the list at > >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_8.4_Open_Items > >> > >> > >> change cardinality() for multi-dim arrays? > >> > >> Drop; there's no consensus that this should be changed > > > > I don't think we should let this go quite so easily, as this is a > > new function, so the bias should be to "getting it right" rather > > than "don't change it". > > I think it is right already, but the point is debatable. > > > The supplied functionality is not only surprising, but easily > > obtained by an existing function. ISTM if we're supplying a new > > function it should have new functionality. > > Well, it's a compatibility function...
It's actually in SQL:2008. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[email protected]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [email protected] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list ([email protected]) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
