2009/4/11 Grzegorz Jaskiewicz <g...@pointblue.com.pl>: > > On 11 Apr 2009, at 13:33, Hitoshi Harada wrote: > >>> Maybe trigger functions should be displayed separately too than ? >> >> You don't catch the point. The aggregate entries in pg_proc have >> prosrc = 'aggregate_dummy', which means they're dummy and the entities >> are stored in pg_aggregate. Triggers in pg_proc are dummy? No, they >> are actually plain functions with trigger return type. > > yes, that's from strictly insider's point of view. Based on the > implementation of that in postgresql, but you guys talk about user > perspective, after all - psql is for users, not only for postgresql hackers. > So the better question would be, can you use window, aggregate, trigger > functions the same way other procedures ? I guess the answer is no :) > Hence, if classify - than I would suggest to do it completely and fair, and > not judge it only from postgresql-hacker perspective. > > I am hardly the postgresql-hacker myself, so it is my opinion from user > perspective, that also understands where your opinion comes from. >
It seems I that didn't catch the point. Still, I don't like such variable syntax for psql -- window, aggregate, plain function, trigger, i/o, cast and more -- I cannot remeber them all :( Regards, -- Hitoshi Harada -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
