Kevin Grittner wrote: > Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> wrote: > > It would be nice to know if we are ever going to set > > standard_conforming_strings to on. > > My personal bias is to go to the standard behavior as the default at > some point. For legacy reasons, I don't know that you would ever want > to remove the setting; especially since I don't think it adds much > code if you're going to support the E'...' literals. The ugliest > thing about this GUC is that it adds some complications to the flex > code, but it doesn't seem that bad to me.
Agreed, we would probably never remove standard_conforming_strings. -- Bruce Momjian <br...@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
