Andrew Gierth <and...@tao11.riddles.org.uk> writes:
> "Tom" == Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
> Tom> Back to the point at hand: do we want to look at making plpgsql
> Tom> respect the GUC?
> Surely what matters is the value of the GUC at the time that you did
> the CREATE FUNCTION, not the value at the time you happen to be
> calling it?
No, it isn't, and that's not the immediate problem anyway --- the
immediate problem is that plpgsql doesn't respect *any* value of
the GUC.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
