On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 9:39 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> 3. The integration with the community login system is currently rather >> poor. The problem is that we can't count on patch submitters to have >> a community login, and even if they do we can't count on the person >> adding the patch to the system to know what it is. We could of course >> require patch submitters to have a community login and to add their >> patches themselves, but I'm not really that keen on raising the bar >> for submitting a patch even to that modest extent. > >> I'm open to >> suggestions on how to improve this situation, though, because it's >> definitely not ideal, and precludes things that reasonable people >> might want to do, like "contact the guy who submitted this patch", >> "contact the authors of all patches waiting for review", and similar. > > I don't understand why that bit would be based on community login at > all. Wouldn't contacting someone mainly need an email address?
Yes. Humor me be elaborating on your thought here? ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
