> I know it can have an adverse effect on a mail server, is syslog going > to give us any performance hits? Yes. On some platforms (HP-UX at least) applications can stall ~2s retrying if syslogd is not reading the messages written to its pipe. syslogd also has a reputation for using too much CPU under load, but this is annecdotal only -- I've not seen such a situation myself. Regards, Giles ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster
- [HACKERS] syslog by default? Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Giles Lean
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Martín Marqués
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Tatsuo Ishii
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Joel W. Reed
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] syslog by default? Bruce Momjian