Bruce Momjian wrote: > Alvaro Herrera wrote: > > Why not? Right now it's single-threaded. Would it be faster if it ran > > several copies in parallel? > > Sure, but that assumes you have parallel I/O channels; I assume right > now it is I/O limited.
But so does parallel pg_restore, no? -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
