Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Bruce Momjian wrote:
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Why not? Right now it's single-threaded. Would it be faster if it ran
several copies in parallel?
Sure, but that assumes you have parallel I/O channels; I assume right
now it is I/O limited.
But so does parallel pg_restore, no?
Well, no, it assumes you're not saturating your I/O bandwidth, which
turns out to be the case more often than you might expect, even without
multiple I/O channels.
cheers
andrew
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
