Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Stefan Kaltenbrunner <ste...@kaltenbrunner.cc> writes: >> Any objections if I add: >> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2009-06/msg00215.php >> to the (currently empty) list of open items for 8.4? > > I am unable to duplicate any slowdown on this test case. AFAICT > 8.4 and 8.3 branch tip are about the same speed; if anything 8.4 > is faster. Testing on x86_64 Fedora 10 ... I just ran the specified test on: Linux ATHENA 2.6.16.60-0.31-smp #1 SMP Tue Oct 7 16:16:29 UTC 2008 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Linux version 2.6.16.60-0.31-smp (ge...@buildhost) (gcc version 4.1.2 20070115 (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Tue Oct 7 16:16:29 UTC 2008 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64) VERSION = 10 PATCHLEVEL = 2 I did configure with a prefix and these options: --enable-integer-datetimes --enable-debug --disable-nls --with-libxml I did initdb with --no-locale 8.3.7 real 0m24.249s real 0m24.054s real 0m24.361s 8.4rc1 real 0m33.503s real 0m34.198s real 0m33.931s -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
