On 6/19/09, Andrew Dunstan <and...@dunslane.net> wrote: > Kevin Grittner wrote: > > 8.3.7 > > real 0m24.249s > > real 0m24.054s > > real 0m24.361s > > 8.4rc1 > > real 0m33.503s > > real 0m34.198s > > real 0m33.931s > > Ugh. This looks like a poster child case for a benchfarm ... > > Is there any chance you guys could triangulate this a bit? Good initial > triangulation points might be the end of each commitfest. (I have a vested > interest in making sure COPY performance doesn't regress, since it will > affect parallel restore's speed in spades.)
git bisect? -- marko -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
